Postdoctoral Fellow, Financial Services Innovation Lab
Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology
🤖 This site is built for humans and AI agents alike. Agents: start at
/llms.txt for a structured index of every paper, PDF,
abstract, and replication package here. Papers whose data are public ship with full
replication code and LaTeX source that rebuild every number from scratch — you are welcome
to clone, reproduce, and build on them.
I am a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Scheller College of Business at the Georgia Institute of Technology and instructor of Fintech & Crypto Tokens. My research focuses on Household Finance: the study of how we all (households) use financial instruments and markets to achieve our objectives (to paraphrase John Campbell). My work combines field and natural experiments, newly constructed historical data, and structural models.
I hold a PhD in Finance from Stanford University, where I was advised by Amit Seru, and an AB in Economics and Mathematical Sciences from Harvard College. I have in the past been an economic consultant at Cornerstone Research. I live with my wife and our dog Scoop in Atlanta, GA. I will be on the 2026–27 academic job market.
Working paper (PDF) · LaTeX source · Job-market talk (slides, PDF) · slides source
This paper measures household discount rates using default decisions rather than asset prices or choices in laboratories. When a borrower decides whether to default, the relative sensitivity of that decision to short-run payment burdens versus long-run debt obligations reveals the borrower's rate of time preference. I formalize this insight in an endogenous default model and show that two comparative statics—the effect on default of a change in monthly payments and of a change in total repayment—are sufficient statistics for the discount factor. Applying this method to over six million U.S. auto loans, I estimate an average annual discount factor of β = 0.79, implying a 27% annual discount rate—far steeper than the 4% typically assumed in macroeconomic calibrations. Discount rates vary sharply with income but are nearly flat across credit scores, suggesting that high default rates among low-score borrowers reflect income risk and costs of default rather than impatience. Extending the method across consumer debt contracts at maturities from two to seventeen years reveals a steeply declining term structure of discount rates—including within borrower—evidence of a discount rate schedule rather than a single rate. These findings provide the first large-scale, revealed-preference distributional estimates of time preferences for households who do not participate in asset markets.
🏆 Best Paper on Financial Institutions, Western Finance Association (2024)
Paper (PDF) · CEPR Discussion Paper 17994
We study how debt moratoria affect loan repayment and banking relationships using a nationwide experiment with consumer loans in India. In the experiment, borrowers receive forbearance offers presented as an initiative of their lender or the result of government regulation. Borrowers who are offered forbearance by their lender are 3.7 percentage points (8.6 percent) less likely to default than borrowers who receive an identical offer presented as a result of government regulation. Borrowers who are offered forbearance by their lender also have causally higher trust in banks and demand for future interactions with the lender in a follow-up experiment.
🏆 Best Paper, Young Scholars Session, Georgia Tech–Atlanta Fed Household Finance Conference (2024)
🏆 Best Paper, Cherry Blossom Financial Literacy Conference (2024)
Paper (PDF) · Replication package (code, data, LaTeX source) · Yellow Pages OCR corpus on Zenodo
Before 1970, most short-term U.S. consumer credit was extended by merchants; today banks extend it through credit cards. Using the 1978 Marquette decision, which unexpectedly ended binding usury regulation, I estimate that the induced 20% decline in merchant lending raised retail net entry—my proxy for merchant profits—by about 4%, most for small firms. New establishment-level data on card acceptance, hand-collected from archival Yellow Pages, combined with a model separating cost reduction from merchant substitutability, show lower costs rather than competition drive the effect: banks' scale and risk-bearing cut accepting merchants' costs by roughly 4%.
The replication repository rebuilds every figure, table, and the paper PDF from raw data with one command, and releases the archival Yellow Pages OCR corpus as a public good for the next researcher (human or AI).
Paper (PDF) · Public repository (code, data, LaTeX source)
We study the extent to which online deliberation aggregates information before collective votes. Our setting is Arbitrum DAO, a decentralized organization controlling a $3.5 billion treasury, where token holders debate proposals on a public forum before each binding vote. Forum activity predicted vote closeness before March 2024 but became uninformative after, coinciding with language models capable of producing indistinguishable governance prose — and the signal degrades at a time when relatively few posts are actually AI-generated. A model of endogenous posting, reading, and voting, derived from primitives, shows this is a general phenomenon: the signal value of a forum collapses at a discrete tipping point at a realized AI share strictly below the level that would mechanically destroy reading value, and the collapse is hysteretic — reducing AI volume afterward does not restore the forum. Calibrating to the data, the forum generated net social benefits equivalent to saving at least 858 words of research effort per delegate per proposal, all destroyed at the tipping point. Delegates who rely on AI hold far less voting power than those who do not, which is inconsistent with power capture by insiders. Our results suggest that the mere availability of indistinguishable AI writing can degrade the governance capabilities of economically important organizations, even when such AI is rarely used in equilibrium.
Lenders increasingly underwrite with different sources of information: national banks with credit scores and audited financials, local banks with soft relationship knowledge, and fintech lenders with cash-flow and alternative data. We study how competition works when lenders observe differentiated private signals of creditworthiness, so that winning an applicant carries a winner's curse — rivals with different signals may have priced or passed on the same borrower. Competition then has two opposing effects on interest rates: business stealing compresses markups, while the winner's curse pushes prices up. We build a structural model of lending under adverse selection with differentiated screening and test its predictions in the U.S. small business credit market, using the Basel III accord as a marginal-cost shock to the cross-section of lenders. Consistent with the theory, rates are U-shaped in competition, and pass-through of bank cost shocks to non-bank lenders is stronger in less competitive markets — including the common-values signature that a cost increase at one lender can lead competitors to lower their prices.